The Herald Serving Johnston County Since 1882
Site Search
High: 84°
Low:  73°
74 °
5-Day Forecast
Friday, September 5, 2008 Register/Log In | Subscribe to the Paper | Place an Ad

Columns Home / Opinion / Columns  




Published: Jun 18, 2008 12:58 PM
Modified: Jun 18, 2008 12:58 PM

Today in North Carolina: Budget elicits little debate
Story Tools
  Printer Friendly   Email to a Friend
  Enlarge Font   Decrease Font
  del.icio.us   Digg it
More Columns
Advertisements
It was hot outside, shimmering waves of distortion rising from the baked, white stone and concrete out front. Inside, it was a bit cooler.

The 120 people who make up the North Carolina House of Representatives were debating the chamber’s proposed budget.

And really, there wasn’t much to debate.

A tightening economy meant a tightening budget. As such, the $21.3 billion budget didn’t have much in it to make anybody mad. And unlike past years, at least to this point, less discretionary money hasn’t led to more fighting over what’s available.

The end result was a budget that raised spending less than 4 percent from the previous year, didn’t raise taxes and provided modest raises for state employees ranging from $1,100 to 3 percent.

A few Republicans grumbled about the half-billion dollars in new non-voter-approved borrowing, the money mainly going to build new university buildings and prisons. The borrowing continues a trend that probably should have caused more than grumbling and heartburn.

Still, Republicans had little more to complain about, and most hopped aboard the train to vote in favor of the plan written by Democratic budget-writers.

Oh, but wait. There was at least a little drama.

Rep. Carey Allred, an Alamance County Republican, brought up one of his perennial complaints — that the highest-paid state employees don’t deserve raises.

As usual, Allred’s motion to strike out raises for top agency officials, bringing their pay up to $123,000, failed. But the ball was rolling now. Allred had some particularly choice words about the pay of State Lottery Director Tom Shaheen, with his annual salary of $246,000. “When I voted for the lottery, I didn’t mean for the director of the lottery to be the winner of the lottery,” Allred quipped.

And the State Lottery Commission — its money coming from lottery receipts and freed of some state budget constraints — had just voted to give a 5-percent raise to its 225 employees.

And it’s an election year.

Democrats weren’t about to be outdone.

The next day, as the second of two required votes was about to be held, Rep. Ty Harrell, a Wake County Democrat, introduced an amendment limiting lottery employees to the same raise as other state employees. Now the rolling ball was a blur. The House voted unanimously for the measure.

In Harrell’s view, and apparently in that of about 119 other people, giving lottery employees a larger raise wouldn’t do much for the morale of other state employees.

“They shouldn’t be given any preferential treatment,” Harrell said afterward. “I think that’s kind of an outrage.”

Of course, the vote might also be taken as a sign about the continuing ambivalence a lot of North Carolinians still have about the game, almost three years after its creation.

Or, maybe House members just needed something to fuss about.

They sure didn’t find a whole lot else to quarrel and fret over in this budget.

All rights reserved. This copyrighted material may not be published, broadcast or redistributed in any manner.
advertisements
View All » Top Jobs
  Triangle Member Newspapers:    The News & Observer   |   The Chapel Hill News   |   The Cary News   |   The Durham News   |  Eastern Wake News   |  The Herald   |  North Raleigh News
  © Copyright 2008, The News & Observer Publishing Company, a subsidiary of The McClatchy Company

  Help | Contact Us | Parental Consent | Privacy | Terms of Use | N&O Store | Advertising
Member of the
Real Cities Network
Hosting Partners of
newsobserver.com