The Herald Serving Johnston County Since 1882
Site Search
High: 81°
Low:  56°
63°
5-Day Forecast
Thursday, May 17, 2012 Register/Log In | Send Us Your News

Editorials Home / Opinion / Editorials  




Published: Dec 04, 2011 08:38 AM
Modified: Dec 04, 2011 08:38 AM

What's a 'recreational facility'?
 
Story Tools
  Printer Friendly   Email to a Friend
  Enlarge Font   Decrease Font
  del.icio.us   Digg it

tool name

close
tool goes here
More Editorials
Advertisements

Most Popular

Two towns in our coverage area recently tweaked their gun ordinances in an effort to comply with a new state law that took effect this week. That law says towns cannot ban handguns from parks but can keep them off of "recreational facilities."

The question that confronted Smithfield and Garner was how to define recreational facility. Smithfield, we suspect, went too far. The town, for example, will allow handguns on its greenway but not on the walking trail at Community Park, which actually connects to the greenway. The thinking, we assume, is that while the walking trail is not a recreational facility, it passes close by playgrounds and ball fields, which certainly are. Our thinking is that Smithfield's definition of recreational facility will be too broad to withstand a court challenge.

Garner, on the other hand, defined "recreational facility" for what it seems to be - a playground, ball field, gym or swimming pool. That definition seems more in line with what the General Assembly, though we suspect the courts will ultimately write the definition. (And we suspect lawmakers were purposely vague in defining recreational facility because they wanted the courts to.)

As for those who think that law-abiding folks ought to be able to carry a gun wherever they want, we're sympathetic. At the same time, we sympathize with moms and dads who might be uncomfortable at the sight of someone packing a handgun on the playground. We sympathize too with referees who don't want to confront parents with pistols, and no one wants an athlete or spectator to get caught in the crossfire of an exchange of gunfire.

We know what gun-rights advocates are thinking right about now: Criminals, because they're criminals, are not going to respect a ban on handguns at recreational facilities. They're right, of course. We just don't know that a ban on handguns on playgrounds is worth challenging in a courtroom or in the court of public opinion.

We will forever defend the right of people in this country to bear arms, but we also support reasonable restrictions on where people can carry guns. Which is to say that if it's reasonable to keep handguns out of, say, courthouses, it's reasonable to keep them off of playgrounds too.

What do you think? Should towns allow handguns on playgrounds, ball fields and other recreational facilities? Send your comments to sbolejack@newsobserver.com.

All rights reserved. This copyrighted material may not be published, broadcast or redistributed in any manner.
advertisements
  Triangle Member Newspapers:    The News & Observer   |   The Chapel Hill News   |   The Cary News   |   The Durham News   |  Eastern Wake News   |  The Herald   |  North Raleigh News
  © Copyright 2012, The News & Observer Publishing Company, a subsidiary of The McClatchy Company

  Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | About our ads | Copyright | Parental Consent Help | Contact Us | N&O Store | Advertising
Hosting Partners of
newsobserver.com